I'll get you, my pretty.

Doesn't this remind you of the famous dress Kate Winslet wore to the Oscars? So cute. And these tops are darling. Not sure if I have the neck to pull them off, though.

Just what I need: a giraffe-print coat.

Relatedly: how would you wear a black version of this jacket? I thought it would be very versatile, but the bulkiness and brocade are making it harder to wear than anticipated.

Yee-haw!

The Image You've Slogged Through the Whole Set to See
Originally uploaded by John Scalzi

A proponent of "man's reason" visits the Creation Museum.

About as meritorious as that other modest proposal

DC Readers: Defend the right of college women to sleep around! Confront proponents of chastity! Attend this November 13 panel on modesty!

The panelists:

• Laura Sessions Stepp - Washington Post writer and author of Unhooked.
• Dr. Miriam Grossman - campus psychiatrist at UCLA and author of Unprotected.
• Wendy Shalit - author of A Return to Modesty and Girls Gone Mild.
• Cassandra DeBenedetto - recent graduate of Princeton University and founder of Princeton's Anscombe Society.
• Dawn Eden - director of the Cardinal Newman Society's Love and Responsibility Program and author of The Thrill of the Chaste and The Dawn Patrol blog.

You must register to attend. To do so, send your name and affiliation to mrybak@eppc.org.

(h/t)

You gotta fight for your right to key parties

The Duncanville, Texas city council, in response to complaints from neighbors about well-attended meetings of a local, non-commercial swingers' club, have banned the following from residences in the town:

"any premises, person or organization that is presented, advertised, held out or styled as, or which provides notification to the public that it is a swinger's club; an adult encounter group or center; a sexual encounter group or center; party house or home; wife, spouse or partner-swapping club; or that it provides permission, an opportunity or an invitation to engage in or to view sexual activity, stimulation or gratification, whether for consideration or not."

Despite the Supreme Court's openness to consideration of secondary effects, this seems like a clear First Amendment violation.

(via)

Indecent Exposure Loophole

The Supreme Court of South Dakota overturned a teenager's conviction for indecent exposure because the defendant didn't exhibit his genitals in public for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification from the act of exposure. He merely sought gratification from sex with a mannequin which happened to be in a public building. South Dakota Real Doll owners, rejoice.

I don't buy the court's interpretation of the statute. Do you?

Aging Ungracefully

Me: Ew, Pauly Shore is old.
Steve: Awww? You think I'm old.
Me: Are you as old as Pauly Shore? (looks it up in Google)
Steve: You're going to think I'm old in ten months.
Me: You're already old.
Steve: You're old.
Me: I am. I'm in my late twenties. That's why I can't break up with you. Who would have me? I'm all used up.

Book Review: The Red and the Black

I'm enjoying this book immensely, but I think I identify too strongly with the protagonist.

I'll repost this when I'm done.

UPDATE: The decision to shoot Mme de Renal was utterly unbelievable and completely ruined the book for me.

Enough about the magazine already.

Woodstock : Boomer hippies : : Sassy Magazine : Women slightly older than me.

Curves

On learning to accept contextual mediocrity.

Dep't. of Unintended Consequences

Indiana Jones saved Hitler.

This post has no title.

GW student commits copycat hate crime by drawing swastikas on her own door.

Trans woman arrested for indecent exposure for dropping trou to prove she's a woman. Meanwhile, 70% of gay and lesbian Americans are willing to throw the transgendered under the bus in order to get federal employment protections.

My mom never bought me toys like this.

Are monks hotter than lawyers?

Spit Take

In the AP coverage of Ron Paul's recent fundraising successes, this passage stood out:

Paul advocates limited government and low taxes like other Republicans, but he stands alone as the only GOP presidential candidate opposed to the Iraq war.

Advocates limited government "like other Republicans"? Which would those be, prithee?

Blade Runner IS Terrible.

This is so, so right. When Blockbuster Video was still running its "Blockbuster Favorites" program (if you rented a "Favorite" and didn't like it, you could get your money back), Blade Runner was the only movie that I and my then-boyfriend hated so much that we were willing to demand a refund.

Diplomats Don't Want to Go to Iraq. Would You?

An insider view of the town-hall meeting held to discuss the drafting of diplomats for Iraq.

FSOs are not a rallying kind of people. As I've detailed elsewhere, they are a careerist kind of people. In a situation such as described by Pastor Niemoeller's famous poem, FSOs are likely to sit down and mentally go through their personal affiliations to try to work out exactly how long they might optimally be able to stay silent before someone comes after them and they need to get the hell out. I mean, let's just establish that from the start, especially as it helps to understand how astonishing the ending of this tale is.

Pasta Sauce With Tomatoes and Mushrooms

I made some pretty decent pasta sauce this weekend. Here's the recipe:

3/4 oz. dried morels
28 oz. can diced tomatoes
1 splash white wine
2 shallots, diced
2 tbsp butter

Soak the morels in about 1-1 1/2 cups hot water for five minutes. Remove mushrooms and slice them. Strain the soaking liquid and set aside.
Saute the shallots in the butter until soft, then add the mushrooms. After about three minutes, add the wine, then the soaking liquid. Allow this to cook down to about 1/3 its original volume, then add the tomatoes. Cover and simmer for about twenty minutes or until the tomatoes start to break down a little. You can put this in the blender to make a smooth sauce or leave it if you don't mind chunkiness. If you don't want a very strong mushroom flavor, add less of the soaking liquid.

This is magic.

Because everything should taste like bacon.

The Streisand Effect: British Royal Family Edition

I never would have posted on this at all if they hadn't made such a fuss.

Love Found

For a while I thought I had imagined this purse, but I am not crazy.


I'm not sure if I want to keep it . . . the color is sort of hard to coordinate.

april hates u, makes lilacs, u no can has.

T.S. Eliot's The Waste Land, translated to lolcat.

There's been an attempt at Prufrock as well (thanks, P).

Big Gay Dumbledore

Interesting discussion on the significance of J.K. Rowling's statement on Dumbledore's sexual orientation can be found here and here.

• Heteronormative assumptions: equivalent to assuming a character's whiteness?
  
• When does something become canon? Was the Silmarillion canon before publication? Are Rowling's notes? What of the oft-alluded Potter encyclopedia she claims to be planning?
  
• This was not exactly a bolt from the blue.
  

Unrelatedly, this book subverting the telepathic-animal subgenre is either going to be appalling or terrific.

We Love Stuff

If I allowed my shopping-dominated id to rule this blog, it would look something like this.

Hating on Harvard (and those other schools)

Everyone hates the Ivy League—even Ivy Leaguers. Why?

Megan McArdle is right that Ivy League snobbery is rampant in D.C. I have friends who feel undeservedly inferior, despite their many stellar achievements and non-Ivy degrees.

It seems reasonable at this point to recall the research on outcomes for Ivy attenders and Ivy-admitted non-attenders. If you could have gotten into an Ivy but didn't [go], congrats! Your life is just as great as it would have been with an Ivy degree.

(Last sentence edited for clarity).

Bitch, J.D.

Should Elizabeth Wurtzel (plagiarist, drug smuggler, and addict par excellence) be admitted to the practice of law?

TSA versus Thai dentists?

I'm pretty sure that this was an outtake in Conspiracy Theory:

If large enough numbers of Americans start flying to South America to look for cheap health care, that’ll reduce the demand for health insurance. The health insurance industry will pull some strings, and air travel will become more difficult for people traveling for medical purposes.

Wha?

Weekend Bake: Quiche Lorraine

Almost every ingredient in quiche is fat . . . which is why it's so delicious.

8 ounces bacon (about 8 slices) cut into 1/2-inch pieces
2 large eggs
2 large egg yolks
1 cup whole milk
1 cup heavy cream
1/2 teaspoon table salt
1/2 teaspoon ground white pepper
1 pinch fresh grated nutmeg
4 ounces Gruyère cheese, grated (1/2 cup)
1 9-inch partially baked pie shell (warm), baked until light golden brown

1. Heat oven to 375 degrees. Fry bacon in skillet over medium heat until crisp and brown, about 5 minutes. Transfer with slotted spoon to paper towel–lined plate. Meanwhile, whisk all remaining ingredients except cheese in medium bowl.

2. Spread cheese and bacon evenly over bottom of warm pie shell and set shell on oven rack. Pour in custard mixture to 1/2-inch below crust rim. Bake until lightly golden brown and a knife blade inserted about one inch from the edge comes out clean, and center feels set but soft like gelatin, 32 to 35 minutes. Transfer quiche to rack to cool. Serve warm or at room temperature.

Next time, I will omit or reduce the salt and roll the dough between sheets of plastic wrap. It is still very tasty, though.

Free the Montclair Pair

Once we lose our right to eat delicious cheese, what do we have left?

Awww

How could anyone think this wasn't cute?

Efficient Breach

Megan McArdle reserved a hotel room at the Comfort Inn in Jamaica, Queens. When she arrived, her hotel room had been given to someone else--probably someone who bribed the desk clerk. Giving away a blogger's room was a mistake. Upon reflection, McArdle notes

it had never occurred to me that when you bribe a hotel clerk for a room, this is what you are bribing them to do to someone. Thankfully, I've never bribed anyone--I lack the chutzpah--but I'd feel pretty awful if I had, and I'll never laugh at it when someone else tells such a story again.

Nearly everyone agrees that the desk clerk (who gave away McArdle's room and then lied about it) was in the wrong. But is it wrong to bribe desk clerks in this way?* If you say it isn't, do you also believe that attempting to seduce someone in a committed relationship is morally neutral? What if both victims were compensated (a room found at another hotel, a setup with someone compatible, money)?

* Presumably there are less problematic bribes; you might want to switch rooms in a hotel that does not assign them at the time of reservation or to upgrade to a better class of room if there is one unreserved. Neither of these would cheat another guest out of something they were entitled to under the benefits of their bargain and thus they seem less unjust.

Links "R" Us

Suing for sex? Service of process is not good foreplay.

This paper arguing for a "cultural theory of Mary Sue fiction as fair use" would be good if the authors actually knew what a Mary Sue is. Haven't they heard of Marty Stus? For every person writing fanfic who is consciously or unconsciously responding to cultural subjugation of women and minorities, there are five hundred unrepentant narcissists and slavering lustbunnies whose only motivation is to gratify themselves in the simplest and most uncomplicated of ways.

If they boot Amber the cutthroat bitch from House I am going to be so ticked. (NO SPOILERS IN THE COMMENTS.)

Vote for your favorite student blogger to get $10,000.

I like sexy children's costumes, if only because the women's "one-size" costumes swallow me but the girls' XL fits just fine.

My house

The horror.

This explains a lot about some of the comments I get.

Due Process Takes It On The Chin Again

Oh, rats.

Villains You Love

Which fictional villains do you sympathize or identify with? Situations in which one or more of the following is true do not count:

I. The supposed villain turns out not to be villainous at all.

II. [You] sympathize with the villain because [you] disagree with the story's ideological message.

III. The villain isn't really responsible for his actions.

IV. The villain turns out to be the lesser of two evils.

Magneto is a popular choice, and Ilya Somin makes a good case for Gordon Gekko. I never understood what people had against Captain Ahab, but I'm an odd duck. I recently rewatched The Piano and found myself sympathizing, against my will, with the cuckold.

Most modern horror movies expect the audience to identify with the homicidal maniac, not with the hapless victims. Witness the evolution of Hannibal Lecter. The author and filmmakers introduced some elements of IV, but only after witnessing the massive positive reaction to the unsoftened Lecter character.

With respect to cinema villains, it's hard to divorce the actor from the role. Would Harry Lime be appealing in the least without Orson Welles's charismatic and jaunty portrayal? Would I so dearly love Richard III with anyone but Ian McKellen as the lead? (I refuse to watch any other version.) I often root for the villain in films but admit that it is nearly always because the villain is played by someone attractive. Casting directors seem to think that British accents convey evil, but sex trumps morality in the fictional realm.

Felicitations

This weekend I've seen newlyweds, being-weds (congrats!), former colleagues, former classmates, and bloggers galore. I should also have another article published soon. Huzzah.

Incidentally, why is Villette so little read?

Some links

What shape are you?

"Drunk" women can't be raped?

Fantasy baseball fans can thank Judge Morris Arnold for saving their version of America's pastime from the clutches of MLB.

Best shopping search engine ever.

UPDATED: Resolved: The opposite of rape is not consent. The opposite of rape is enthusiasm.
Todd Solondz's Storytelling illustrated this dynamic in an interesting way.

Sports Make American Children Stupider

Starting school later allows kids to sleep more. Research indicates that "“[a] loss of one hour of sleep is equivalent to [the loss of] two years of cognitive maturation and development." With high school kids, the correlation between additional sleep and higher grades is even more pronounced. But schools continue to start high school classes before eight in the morning. Why? One popular answer seems to be extracurriculars: earlier start times allow more after-school practice hours.

A kid who doesn't sleep properly is functionally equivalent to a kid with lead poisoning. But who cares as long as the football team goes all the way?

Then again, what do I know? I'm just a bitter, unsporty former high schooler who had to get up at 5:30 (5:00 on ROTC days) to catch a 6:15 bus to my first class at 7:30.

Legal != Moral

This is worth quoting:

People have a legal right to mutter "bitch" as I walk past, blog extensively about how fat and unattractive I am, or ignore my ideas on the grounds that Irish Catholics are naturally stupid. Businesses have a legal right to provide sullen and unhelpful salespeople, filthy premises, and cheaply made products that fall apart one day after the warranty expires. All Americans have the legal right to say nasty things to their spouses, watch football instead of talking to their kids, stop bathing, and drop dear old friends in favor of richer, more attractive ones.

I would not dream of making any of these things against the law. But I can still be appalled when people do them. Being a libertarian means recognizing the limits of the formal legal system to regulate human behavior--not recognizing the formal legal system as the only limitation on human behavior.

When Blogcrushes Go Bad

Check this out. I'm glad this never happened to me. Kudos to the recipient for the internet-based public shaming.

What's Montague?

Interesting story on the Syrian Jewish community in Brooklyn in the NYT Magazine. The gist is that not only is intermarriage forbidden, but so is marriage with a convert, the descendant of a convert, or anyone who cannot produce

proof, going back at least three generations and attested to by an Orthodox rabbi, of the candidates’ kosher bona fides. This disqualifies the vast majority of American Jews, who have no such proof. “We won’t take them — not even if we go back three or four generations — if someone in their line was married by a Reform or Conservative rabbi, because they don’t perform marriages according to Orthodox law,” [the chief rabbi] said.

Boys also appear to follow their fathers into family businesses, to the detriment of continued secular education. Women's status and autonomy seem low.* The article has provoked negative reactions from Muslims and Harry-Potter-loving J-dubs and inspired Ms. Maltz to quip that the article's subjects are "soon to be the most-despised community in America."

Anyway, it reminded me of this issue, as well as U.S. Const. art. III, § 3. It also provoked a heated discussion with Steve on the relative objectionability of the aforementioned practices, however they are actually followed and regardless of which group practices them. Nothing highlights the universality of patriarchy like a rousing comparative religious debate.

* The article has several internal inconsistencies and some claim that the intermarriage barrier is slightly more permeable than the article makes out. I'm sure this will be clarified in days to come.

Lost Love

Although I am not allowed to buy any handbags until 2016, I saw the most striking bag the other day. It was (I think) at a Nordstrom, and (maybe?) a D&G. It was a patent leather hobo in "petroleum," which was a rich teal. I wanted to stare at it longingly online this evening and can't find it anywhere.

UPDATE: Still no sign. If you go to hip nightclubs, though, this might be right up your alley.

California Love

So if you work for UCLA, can you hang this on your wall (just to thumb your nose at the Russian cultural minister, of course)?

This is very important.

Which way is she spinning? And is she always on the same leg? Which one?

Janna St. James, meet Kenny Wayne Lockwood.

Anyone who meets people online should read this. It involves Harlan Ellison, dead dogs, internet romance, and the weirdest intervention ever. This related blog is worth reading once you are done with the article. (via)

Hate Crimes

Another Kerri Dunn at Columbia? We'll see.

Fine Dining

Note to self: If you ask a Kinko's employee for a nice place to get dinner in the area, you will be directed to an establishment which has as its claim to fame "the world's largest selection of draft beers."

I am very excited! About fashion!

Purple! Gray! And more! Blue! Black! Black and white! Boots that remind me of my old blog design!

Arr!

In Wes Anderson's movies, white people often start relationships with people of color after a failed relationship with another white person. Apparently this is deeply offensive. After all, said one commenter:

"Why must women of color be a second choice for white men?"

If it Anderson's white men were initially in relationships with women of color but somehow always ended up with white chicks in the end, wouldn't that be offensive also? "Why must women of color be pushed aside for white women?" etc.

There's also criticism of Anderson's use of Kumar Pallana, the actor who plays Pagoda and Mr. Littlejeans. I would think that his limited roles and characterizations are a function of the fact that he is the owner of a coffee shop where Anderson used to hang out, not a trained actor. Plenty of directors put friends and family in their movies. Anderson has the good judgment to not ask more from his friend than Pallana can provide as an actor (take note, David Mamet!). For this he is to be condemned? Pah.

P.S. The pirates in The Life Aquatic are not Filipino because "Anderson is saying, 'The pirates are Filipino! How hilarious is that?'" They are Filipino because right now there are actual Filipino pirates. Swashbuckling white guys a la Blackbeard? Not so much these days.

No Touching!

If you're a hyper-religious Muslim who dumps guys for holding your hand on the fourth date, maybe you're better off meeting potential husbands in a venue where that pesky physical contact thing doesn't come up.

College-age guys with guns

I can't help but compare this to the Virginia Tech incident and wonder cynically whether we'll see calls to disarm police.

Doesn't "transhumanism" sound much nicer anyway?

Economics professor Random person on right-wing website supports eugenics; teeth-gnashing ensues. The "executing at childbirth" and abortion angles are red herrings; there was nothing in the original post's argument that required either. The idea of a government-sponsored eugenics program is scary enough even without those aspects, of course. But doesn't this seem desirable? Random mutations aren't going to get us there.

Can't-Miss Movies

I also have a sick weakness for The Fifth Element.

The past is another country

All this discussion of multifamily living reminds me of one of the things that struck me most strongly about reading fiction set in the early part of the twentieth century: the commonness of having boarders (usually single men) renting rooms in family homes. This seemed most typical for older women to use for income in lieu of outside jobs, but there's no reason it would have to be this way.

Renting rooms in what would otherwise be single-family homes is foreign to our modern sensibilities (and probably now violates many zoning ordinances), but how many McMansion owners could have swung their ARM payments by doubling up the kids and renting spare bedrooms to young students or professionals?

Men Are Strong

This is why I like guns.

Obligatory Legal Post

Which of the posters in this thread has the best sexual harassment claim?

Out and Proud

Other than Dr. House, how many openly atheistic characters are there on television?

Wacky Sizing

Some of the comments in this thread alluded to "vanity sizing," which I've posted on before. The EU has established an interesting new clothing standard based on body measurements, but the effective deployment of sizing standards depends upon the measurements actually being accurate.

Fame!

Sort of. The case is interesting, anyway, if you like school prayer litigation.

Thanks, Karl.

Yes, you are.

Isn't this collection of photos documenting the appearance of given weight/height combinations just a copy of this project? And isn't it obvious that, despite the protests, in most cases the BMI indicator is accurate?

UPDATE: The subject of one of the photos is incensed about this "bullshit blog and its commenters." Here is her response:

My picture on Kate’s blog was identified as an anomaly — in the readers’ opinions, I’m the only one who didn’t meet the BMI category of overweight. I was also described as bangin‘ and hot.

Yeah, I know, it’s so flattering to read comments about my body and how it relates to the BMI scale. I also love how strange people feel inclined to comment upon my appearance and suggest that I dress well for my weight. Another reader suggests that the picture is somehow strategically chosen to represent my body at its best.

The only thing strategic about the picture is the fact that my hair looks somewhat decent. The rest is me - 100%, unedited Laurie Ruettimann. I do look fabulous, of course, but I looked fabulous when I weighed 170 lbs. I didn’t lose weight to lose weight. I lost weight to reclaim my right to own my moods and my depression. (emphasis added)

There is of course a (slim?) distinction the words between "pretty" and "beautiful," which Kate Harding, the creator of the project, used to describe the women pictured, and the terms connoting sexual appeal which commenters used here. Now that it has become apparent that sexualized comments are unwelcome, future offense may be avoided. But it seems a bit much to submit a photo for a project about bodies and how they relate to the BMI scale and then complain that readers are discussing your body and how it relates to the BMI scale.

Like Ms. Ruettimann, I am five feet tall. I envy her bone structure and musculature; if I weighed 130 pounds, I would certainly not look "fabulous," and at 170 pounds I would be even less so.

Bookshelves in the Oval Office

Does anyone really believe that the President reads 87 books per year? I might have read that many in 2005 (I didn't count re-reads for purposes of the challenge), but during that year I was a student, an unemployed wastrel studying for the bar exam, and a government employee in a small city with little in the way of other entertainments. Reading that many books takes time! Presidents should not have time-consuming hobbies. It's not as bad as being obsessed with sports, but still.

How many books do you actually read? Skimming and reading only the good parts doesn't count (sorry, Tyler).

Hotness

Is "hot" not a compliment? Or is heat power?

Sunday Lunch: Risotto With Herbs

I make a lot of risotto lately, especially mushroom; it's something you can make without fresh ingredients that is nonetheless tasty. Today we had fresh basil & parsley and I made this variation:

Basil & Parsley Risotto

1/2 medium onion, minced
3/4 cup Arborio rice (I get mine from Trader Joe's, which has it for a good price)
splash white wine
2 1/2 cups chicken broth (Better Than Bouillon, because I never use a whole carton of broth before it goes bad. If you use this, add no extra salt.)
1/2 cup chopped fresh herbs
1 tbsp unsalted butter
1/4- 1/2 cup grated Parmesan cheese

Cook onion in a little olive oil over medium heat for 3-5 minutes. Add rice and stir until rice is oily. Add wine; stir and let bubble away. Then add broth, 1/2 cup at a time, and allow it to almost get dry in between additions, stirring every minute or so. Cook 20-30 minutes or until rice is not quite tender. Add herbs, butter, and cheese.

More pix

Whole bunch of photos from the Switzerland trip on Flickr. I still need to tag them, but they go roughly Geneva - Zermatt/Matterhorn - Zurich - Interlaken.

Bad Sales Tactics

Steve and I are walking around the farmers' market. I beeline toward the mushroom table, where they are still setting up. We watch as a woman opens a box of commercially packaged mushrooms (the same brand you can buy at the grocery store) and transfers them to little baskets. She then pulls out a five-gallon plastic bag of another variety and starts doing the same with these.

"How much are these chanterelles?" I ask.

"Ten dollars. They're wild."

"Hmm. No thanks."

Also: the store with the hot mod shift dress? Closed itself for a private event just when I came back to show Steve the garment and order my size. Guess who lost a sale and guess who bought a sweater dress instead? I am very particular about giving commissions to the people who helped me find an item when I come back to purchase it later. Your loss, Andrea!

Questions

Maybe it's silly that I don't know the answer to these questions, but there it is.

- In last night's episode of The Office, a joke revolved around Andy's problem with nipple chafing from running. I have only ever heard guys complain about this. Why?

- What makes chicken and waffles a good pairing? Do you wrap the waffles around the chicken? Do you mop up syrup with the chicken?

Unconstitutional? Ya think?

Go Judge Lawson.

U.S. District Court Judge David M. Lawson struck down [Michigan's] Minor in Possession (MIP) law because it “authorizes police officers to perform a search of minors without a warrant or legal excuse for not obtaining one” in violation of their Fourth Amendment rights. The decision does not apply to drivers of a motor vehicle and allows police officers to administer breath tests without warrants in emergencies.

Michigan is among a handful of states nationwide with an MIP law that makes it illegal for young adults and minors who are pedestrians to refuse a Breathalyzer test even though police do not have a search warrant. Those who refuse to take tests in Michigan are guilty of a civil infraction and must pay a $100 fine. In addition, police in some places — including Michigan State University — tell students that if they refuse to submit to a Breathalyzer upon demand that they could spend up to a dozen hours in jail.

(via)

Shopping Thoughts

1. I always forget to dress up to go to the mall, and then I get the cold shoulder from some of the staff. One of them directed me to the cheap section on the first floor and another tried to warn me off of a pair of "expensive" pants. Bleh. Maybe this is why women buy tacky, loud logo bags. The understated designer bag doesn't scream, "she has money to buy your stuff and spends it stupidly!" I got the pants and am having them tailored because of the problem in (2).
2. The money spent on the trainer last year was a good investment, considering the number of things I try on and then don't buy because the smallest size is still too big.
3. The difference between what's available at the store and what's available online is really infuriating. I'd prefer to get my Lucky Rewards discount, apply some random coupons from Google, and avoid sales tax, but neither the hot pointy-toed boots I liked from Nordstrom nor the mod shift dress* I found at Cusp were available online. This sweater, which was a dress on me, is, but I'm hesitant to buy something than you have to wear layers under (and to buy the XS, which they didn't have in-store but which is probably better fitting).

* Like this, but black. It has pockets! And a pink silk lining!

Children, Nudity, and Britney Spears

Commenters on my previous posts about public sex and nudity asked, "what about the children?" Slate made a half-hearted effort to determine the effects of kids seeing their parents naked. Two thoughts:

1. I have trouble taking seriously any article that unironically uses the words "Oedipal anxiety."
2. Children whose parents defy cultural norms may become uncomfortable once the dissonance between parental action and those norms becomes apparent? Who knew?
   

Dorothy No More

I really want to dress up for Halloween this year, but I need 1) a costume and 2) a costume party. The last time I went all-out was 1L year, and that is much too long ago. I thought about going as Margot Tenenbaum, but I might have to bleach my hair to get the right look. Ideas? Keep in mind I am trying not to be lame.

Bits and Pieces

Hating on Roth.

The proper response to fashion police.

Someone in Norway likes my paragliding post.

Against the feminization of cupcakes.

Best bowling tournament ever.

Literary Criticism

Hating on Brooklyn Books of Wonder.

Hating on Pynchon.

Hating on Harry Potter 7.

I read The Last Colony over the weekend. Verdict: meh. I won't hate on it, though.

(h/t Bookslut times two)

Fear of Flying

According to the pilot, I was more relaxed about my first paragliding experience than most people are. I told her that once you jumped off the hill into the air, it didn't seem like it would do much good to get upset about it.

I highly recommend this particular form of recreation.

Pot Effective in Treating Mad Cow Disease?

I love venison, but eating anything but imported stuff makes me nervous because American deer have freaky mad-cow-like prion diseases. Maybe we should give avid hunters medical marijuana.

God Monkey Robot

On another note

Interesting post on kissing technique. The video that sparked the conversation (fast-forward to the 2:00 mark) is worth checking out for tips on what not to do. One should not kiss like a snake strikes, but I disagree that one should just be still and let the tongue do the work all the time. For one thing, darting in and pulling away allows for surprising excursions to the ear or neck, nibbling, etc.

I hate D.C.

I lost my card case and am full of impotent rage. The cute silk case with the bunny pattern from Japan? Gone. SmartCard with $20? Gone. Collection of various business cards? Gone. Customer service for SmartCard and Metro? Useless.

Recent Comments Widget

Via Belle, a mechanism for monitoring recent comments on this site. I replaced the Recent Posts section with this. Let me know if anyone is upset by its removal.

Death doesn't make the incessant references to hair-pulling any more tolerable.

I am more than a little appalled at some of the reactions to Robert Jordan's death. He sounds like he was a very nice man, but some of the encomiums to the quality of his writing are a bit rich even by the standards of commentary about the recently deceased. But maybe I'm just bitter about the days of my high school life that I'll never get back that were wasted on books 1-7. The first spirited argument I had at college was with a guy in my honors history seminar on why The Eye of the World was derivative, sexist tripe. People here know that I will read practically anything in the fantasy genre, but even I could not slog my way through all 7,000+ pages of Jordan's opus.

Epic fantasy with entertwining plotlines and a huge cast of characters is great, but I do ask that said characters, even the women, have personalities, and that there be a plot that goes somewhere. If I wanted to read meandering wankage I could pick up Proust (kidding. sort of.).

Is this how lit fic readers generally feel when they hear genre fans talking about their favorite books?

Relatedly: the best, nerdiest post this week.

Book Review: Lies of Locke Lamora & Red Seas Under Red Skies

"Has it got any sports in it?"

"Fencing. Fighting. Torture. Poison. True love. Hate. Revenge. Giants. Hunters. Bad men. Good men. Beautifulest ladies. Snakes. Spiders. Beasts of all natures and descriptions. Pain. Death. Brave men. Coward men. Strongest men. Chases. Escapes. Lies. Truths. Passion. Miracles."

I've been talking up these books for a while now, but I wanted to write a double review and that had to wait for my completion of the second volume. So:

Here we have two installments of Scott Lynch's Gentleman Bastards sequence. You really must read The Lies of Locke Lamora first. It contains essential backstory, although even with plentiful use of flashback the reader is still left with tantalizing gaps in the characters' history. Without some grounding in Lynch's world, you will be lost, because the cast is large and the plots entwined.

Imagine if George R.R. Martin had written an entire series based on the criminal underworld of King's Landing. Picture as a protagonist a cross between MacGyver, Captain Jack Sparrow, and Parker. Imagine that every time Baldrick had a cunning plan it actually could work. These are books about scheming, lying, cheating thieves, and their schemes incidentally produce a certain amount of high adventure.

Settings range from convincingly filthy slums to soaring towers that may be the relic of a culture from the deep past or the far future (is this more Star Wars than Book of the New Sun? uncertain.). Characterizations are broad when appropriate but generally reflect a more nuanced psychology. In Locke Lamora we could have a generic Prince of Thieves, but Lynch imbues him with personality, history, and flair. He also avoids the general trap of permitting readers to grow too comfortable. Death, mayhem, unexpected reverses, and hollow victories abound.

The first book could exist as a stand-alone feature; most of the main plot threads are resolved by the novel's end, and we get some significant closure while preserving some uncertainty for the future. Red Seas Under Red Skies, by contrast, ends on something of a cliffhanger, and my emotional attachment to the characters is at war with my admiration for Lynch's nerve with respect to how I hope things shake out.

The only quibbles: sometimes the dialogue is pedestrian, although it's occasionally hilarious (who can argue, through a mouthful of broken teeth, with lines like "one plus one equals don't fuck with me"?) and there is NO MORE of this for a long time, since Red Seas was just released. Also, while one can entertain one's self with casting games* and imagining how some of the more dramatic scenes would play on screen, these books, I fear, are basically unfilmable; too much depends on intricate plots that would require substantial narration to explain or, as is perhaps more likely, a more intelligent audience than the average pack of adolescent boys which makes up the target audience for action-adventure movies.

Highly recommended for fantasy and adventure fans and for others who enjoy a good yarn.

* Locke really requires a young Clive Owen type, and perhaps Vincent Cassel might do as as the villain in Lies and Terrence Stamp would for Red Seas. Or maybe not. Thoughts?

Returning

I am en route to the USA. Observations:

• Creepy Swiss guys on trains keeping the spirit of 1970 alive! Nice going.
• Steve has a new method of self analysis: asking himself what a parasailer paraglider would do.
• Swiss food: altogether disappointing. No outings to cheese making monasteries, and no good cheese found randomly along the way.
• We saw some of those famous black sheep political ads. Photos of them and their retaliatory graffiti to come.

Alive

We survived the parasailing paragliding. Check out Steve's blog for more.

Interlaken

If I never blog again it is because I perished while parasailing paragliding.

Zurich

Getting bored of mountains and trains.

Not bored with: 19th & early 20th c. German and Austrian painting. Good thing I have such narrow obsessions.

Book review postponed until I get somewhere that does not charge an extortionate amount for internet access. Am v. angry with non-functional Blackberry.

Nooooo

Big review of Scott Lynch books coming soon.

Am still v. sad re: character death. Read these books!

In Geneva

Switzerland is going well so far. No cheese yet, though. If I never post again, it is because I have fallen off the Matterhorn.

I blame Pam Gann

A commenter at Snarky Bastards observes that my alma mater, despite its being listed as a "best value" private college, has become exorbitantly expensive:

As I recall CMC was $26,500 in 1998/99. If my memory is correct then thats a mere 73.5% growth in 8 years.

Stag Blogger Apollo observes:

In 2000/01, it was $30,000. In 2004/05, it was $40,000. I do not recall the college improving by 33% while I was there.

Also, when I applied the admissions office made a big deal about how they only passed along half of the cost to students and that fundraising covered the other half. Thus they were charging $30,000 per student but spent $60,000 per student. If that still holds true, they are now spending $92,000 per student. I cannot fathom how they can productively spend that much money.

Tuition and fees still make up about half of CMC's revenues. And tuition still tracks expenditures fairly closely. Where does the money go?

EXPENSES	2000	2006	Change
instruction	$12,784,000	$21,305,000	66.65%
research	$2,803,000	$5,516,000	96.79%
academic support	$3,740,000	$4,887,000	30.67%
student services	$7,123,000	$9,513,000	33.55%
institutional support	$8,858,000	$10,929,000	23.38%
auxiliary enterprises	$6,465,000	$7,770,000	20.19%
TOTAL	$41,773,000	$59,920,000	43.44%
Academic Year	2000-2001	2006-2007	Change
Tuition and Fees	$22,580	$33,210	47.08%
Room and Board	$7,420	$10,740	44.74%
Total	$30,000	$43,950	46.50%

Expenses on a per student basis in 2000-2001 were 139% of student charges and in 2006-2007 were 136%.

Research funding has nearly doubled, and instructional costs have risen by two thirds in six years. Are professors collecting bigger paychecks? The faculty size has gone down by 15% over the same period.

Random Roundup

Will the people who got angry at Michael Vick get angry about this? (There is of course a major difference of degree.)

How arrest warrants work.

What lawyers make.

Schizophrenia diagnosis through brain imaging?

The percentage of unbelievers in the U.S. is about the same as the percentage of believers in France.

You can join the Planned Parenthood Pill Patrol and survey pharmacies in your town to check the availability of emergency contraception.

A personal note: I best not see anything like this on my trip. Then again, what can you expect from a country that only let women vote in 1971?

Book Review: Crystal Rain

This was actually my second attempt at reading this book. When it first came out, I picked up a library copy, but after a handful of pages the use of what I thought was invented dialect turned me off. Later I learned that the dialect was actually Caribbean English, which made it seem part of the story instead of self-indulgent affectation. With this in mind, I began to read Crystal Rain a second time.

The premise: John DeBrun is an amnesiac with a past. When bloodthirsty Azteca boil over the mountains and begin sacrificing and conquering his people, he must do what he can to stop the assault, even if that means regaining the memories of his lost life.

The twist here is that both the Azteca and their peaceful neighbors are descendants of colonists from Earth, and both societies worship aliens who have taken the names of Earth gods. The war is in some sense a proxy war between two alien factions, although that makes it no less deadly to the humans.

Another twist is that some of the people are "oldfathers": people with modified bodies and nanotech blood who have lived since humans arrived in the system hundreds of years before. They may be able to make a difference in the fight, or their long lives may have made them so risk-averse as to be cowardly. The oldfathers could have been used to explore some interesting problems a la Lazarus Long, but this is only briefly alluded to. (It does seems unlikely that one of the most famous fighters in the original alien conflict could reappear hundreds of years later and not be immediately recognized by any of the aliens or oldfathers who were alive the entire time.) Kudos to Buckell, though, for resisting any temptation to make the oldfathers all-knowing, kind, and wise. A randomly selection of people given almost eternal life would probably include a hefty share of ignorant cravens and mercenaries.

The Azteca in general interested me, and I want to hear more about them. For instance: how was a dead Earth religion imported to a new planet, adopted by aliens, and embraced by humanity? The character of Oaxyctl, an Azteca spy, is the only one with a significant internal conflict to face, which dims the relative appeal of the protagonist; De Brun's motivations are fairly straightforward, as with most action heroes.

Crystal Rain is perhaps SF's first example of Caribbean steampunk, and therefore a genre unto itself. If you are in the mood for something that's a little bit Star Wars and a little bit Bourne Identity, but with a dreadlocked version of Wolverine thrown in, this book is for you.

Wunderkinds

An email from another overeducated woman:

So what's up with the smarty high-undergrad-pedigree male bloggers? Matthew Yglesias, Ezra Klein, Julian Sanchez, Ross Douthat; yes they are smarties, but they really don't have much education compared to a lot of women bloggers/journalists out there. Not that education = intelligence, but it helps. I think I'm fairly smart, but if I had stopped with my college education in 2002, as much of the above did (and baby Ezra just graduated!) I'd be a rambling dummy. My ideas are still getting shaped and refined, and will never be beyond doubt. Not that grad school has been super useful for me, but it did make me think about new subjects in new ways. And no, this PhD isn't truly necessary, but all the reading and writing I am doing is great, and I'm still benefiting from going to lectures and being among people who are not like me and do not think like me.

Is my friend right? Do men with bachelor's degrees constitute too great a portion of the blogging punditocracy and journalistic elite? Do bloggers with additional formal education provide more valuable insights? Or are young pups better journalists than those ensconced for long periods in the ivory tower?

And why is everyone so pale?

So hot.

Did Wes Anderson make this movie just for me?

Downers

Shalom Auslander on modern fiction and crying jags:

I purchase more novels than I can possibly write off as expenses (trust me, I've tried), and put most of them down before I'm a third of the way through. Call it laziness if you like. I call it prudence: I can only kill myself once, and I'd like the book that makes me do so to be really worth it. I've read enough of them through, though, to know that if there's a baby, it will die. If there's a dog, it will be shot. A heart, broken. A family, torn apart. A city, demolished. A tire, flattened. A toe, stubbed. A nail, bent. A cup of tea, spilled. But cathartic, always cathartic.
...
[M]ost people, if book reviews and Amazon customer comments are anything to judge by, really would prefer to curl up in a chair, read something horrible about the awfulness of people, the futility of life, the inescapability of fate, and the impossibility of love, cry until the snot of authentic art runs from their noses, and feel like they’ve gotten their $21.95 worth. I am not a happy-ending type of person. If the truth is (and the weight of the evidence seems to indicate it as so) that life sucks, at least help me through it. Laugh at the suckiness. Show me why the suckiness is so foolish, so temporary, so meaningless. Comedy is anger (the good comedy, anyway), so Christ, get angry. But get me through it; not just "it's worse than you think," but "it's worse than you think, but it's all pretty stupid." You can't go on, you'll go on. And you'll trade bowler hats a few times, too, and lose a shoe.

Say what you want about genre fiction, but a lot of it is at least somewhat optimistic about the human condition: Mysteries can be solved. Science will take us to the stars. Love can prevail, or at least not destroy lives. (I'm looking at you, Atonement.)

Geek Love

I have a friend who is seeking companionship via Craigslist. This was one of her many emails:

Don't get me wrong, I do enjoy a conversation about the potential reunification of Vulcan and Romulus and Matt Damon's playing a young Kirk but only in the context of someone who would care to talk about such things. I mean come on, how much heavy conversation about the decline of the American Empire and the forced geo-political instability of the middle east can a man and a woman take before ripping their clothes off?

I feel like this is a question that could be answered in an R-rated version of the Tootsie Roll commercial with Mr. Owl.

I'm getting tired of this allergy to ideology.

What's wrong with this sentence by Jeff Rosen about Jack Goldsmith?

In addition to being intellectually curious and having good judgment, he always struck me as a pragmatic rather than an ideological conservative.

Full disclosure: Goldsmith was my Conflicts of Laws professor. I would totally bet on him in a fight against John Yoo.

Imprudent remarks on clothing for youth

Check out these disgusting excerpts from a chat between Emily Yoffe of Slate and her readers, which was based off Yoffe's recent column on the difficulty of finding modest school clothes for her middle-school-aged daughter:

Girls have an obligation to cover up so the boys can focus on schoolwork:

Kansas City, Mo.: As a middle school assistant principal, agree 110 percent with this article—I can't believe what some parents will let their children come to school in. Some look like street walkers—it's no wonder some of our boys have so much trouble concentrating!

Emily Yoffe: So do school administrators send kids home? Do they send out notices saying what's appropriate? And you raise a good point about the boys. Don't parents realize the damage they're doing to both sexes by letting their little girls run around like streetwalkers?

When the cute boys have to wear bags over their heads, I'll buy into the idea that young girls in shorts and tank tops should burqa up.

Yoffe affirms one mother's contention that Chester the Molester goes after your tween because she's asking for it in those clothes:

Killeen, Texas: I have an 11-year-old daughter, and I agree completely with your article. Finally somebody who spoke out. Let the kids be kids as long as they can. Weren't we told that the people we attract depends on what we wear? We complain about predators and sexual offenders, but on the other hand the clothing companies only offer skimpy outfits? What message does that deliver? I wish that all mother of young girls would boycott buying those clothes. Hurray for you and thanks again.

Emily Yoffe: Thanks so much. Yes, if no one bought this stuff, they wouldn't keep making it. It's been interesting to hear from some mothers who think I'm way off base.

Yoffe is unaware that high-waisted jeans have been in for the last year or so:

New York: I don't quite understand why companies are marketing these low rise jeans to girls in the 'tween set ... anyone who reads any fashion magazine has seen high rise jeans skyrocket into popularity again. Do they just want these girls to be slutty and unfashionable?

Emily Yoffe: Please, please tell me high rise jeans are making a return. I can't be soon enough.

The real problem is that tween fashion isn't following trends slavishly enough; it's all about loose-cut trouser jeans now.

If I don't get what I pay for, why would I pay for it?

If fashion designers are concerned about competition from knockoffs, maybe they should differentiate themselves by providing higher quality merchandise? If it's a choice between a cheaply made blouse for $40 and a cheaply made blouse for $400, the only reason to pick the latter is if it's emblazoned with logos or otherwise obviously a designer product (assuming one wants to convey status through such exhibitionism). Several of the designer items I have bought (with the exception of my stunning handbag) have been real disappointments in terms of quality: linings that are missing or improperly sewn, loose threads, variable sizing. I expect this from the Gap, but not from Nanette Lepore.

I want well-tailored clothing made from fabrics with good hand and drape, with consistent and reasonable sizing. (Note: mature human females do not have 27" busts and 26" waists.)

CSI Effect?

It seems odd that there is still debate as to the parentage of certain celebrities. How difficult would it be to obtain a soda can or cigarette butt used by each prince and then run a DNA test? Surely this is the next logical step for the paparazzi. And there are many questions that could be answered through this method.

Perhaps we don't see this kind of DNA snooping due to liability concerns. But is your lineage a private fact? One's purported ancestry is a matter of public record. Would a reasonable person be offended to find out that s/he had a different father? Likewise, is it any more offensive to reveal that someone's genome contains the BRCA1 mutation than it is to follow them to their mammogram or chemotherapy appointments?

Good Faith Inquiry: Who Owns?

In discussing the recent kerfuffle on subprime mortgages, a lot of people have contended that the American subsidies for homeownership are in part to blame, that said subsidies are tax cuts for the wealthy (property owners being wealthier than the average bear), and that other countries incentivize homeownership to a much lesser extent.

That would seem to imply that rates of owner-occupied housing in countries like Great Britain, Germany, and France are substantially lower than the American rate. My question is: Who owns the housing stock there, if not owners? I'm sure the answer is partially "the government," but do other countries have more of their housing stock owned by extremely wealthy individuals or corporations? That would be at odds with the general image of these countries' levels of economic inequality.

I do not think it means what you think it means.

You know what I hate? Fortune cookies that don't have fortunes in them. A fortune is "you will meet a handsome stranger" or "beware the number five." A fortune is not "you are very determined and confident" or "you like Chinese food." It's not called a compliment cookie or an observation cookie. It's a fortune cookie.

Which brings me to the other thing I hate: PostSecret postcards that don't have secrets. It is not a secret if everyone already knows. It is not a secret if it is a platitude. The concept is not complicated. Write something on a card that other people don't know. Send it in.

Grrr.

Daemon Finder

Apparently I am a crow.

Dead Link

When did this happen?