Saturday, November 10, 2007

Indecent Exposure Loophole

The Supreme Court of South Dakota overturned a teenager's conviction for indecent exposure because the defendant didn't exhibit his genitals in public for the purpose of obtaining sexual gratification from the act of exposure. He merely sought gratification from sex with a mannequin which happened to be in a public building. South Dakota Real Doll owners, rejoice.

I don't buy the court's interpretation of the statute. Do you?
blog comments powered by Disqus