It seems like most people agree that the protesters who claim that the constitution supports exclusion of Hindu priests from providing legislative invocations are wrong. But the protesters have a respected voice on their side: Judge Wilkinson of the Fourth Circuit.
Updated to state that the protesters claim that exclusion of the Hindu priest is not just permitted but required, and also to remark that most people, in their discussion of this issue, seem to assume that enactment of the protesters' position into law would be unconstitutional. I posted merely to note that according to at least one federal judge, it is not.
Saturday, July 14, 2007
blog comments powered by Disqus
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)